|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
On
11 November 1967 the Mother said : Sanskrit
! Everyone
should learn that. Especially everyone who works here should learn
that… not the Sanskrit of the scholars… all, all of them, wherever
they may have been born. In
principle, Mother, that is what we are thinking of
–
next year, to make all the
children do Sanskrit, plus their mother tongue. Yes.
Not Sanskrit from the point of view of scholarship, but Sanskrit, a
Sanskrit – how to put it ? – that opens the door to all the
languages of India. I think that is indispensable. The ideal would be,
in a few years, to have a rejuvenated Sanskrit as the representative
language of India, that is, a spoken Sanskrit, so that… Sanskrit is
behind all the languages of India and it should be that. This was Sri
Aurobindo's idea, when we spoke about it. Because now English is the
language of the whole country, but that is abnormal. It is very
helpful for relations with the rest of the world, but just as each
country has its own language, there should… And so here, as soon as
one begins to want a national language, everyone starts quarrelling.
Each one wants it to be his own, and that is foolish. But no one could
object to Sanskrit. It is a more ancient language than the others and
it contains the sounds, the root-sounds of many words. This
is something I studied with Sri Aurobindo and it is obviously very
interesting. Some of these roots can even be found in all the
languages of the world – sounds, root-sounds which are found in all
those languages. Well, this, this thing, this is what ought to be
learnt and this is what the national language should be. Every child
born in India should know it, just as every child born in France has
to know French. He does not speak properly, he does not know it
thoroughly, but he has to know French a little; and in all the
countries of the world it is the same thing. He has to know the
national language. And then, when he learns, he learns as many
languages as he likes. At the moment, we are still embroiled in
quarrels, and this is a very bad atmosphere in which to build
anything. But I hope that a day will come when it will be possible. So I would like to have a simple Sanskrit taught her, as simple as possible, but not "simplified" – simple by going back to its origin… all these sounds, the sounds that are the roots of the words which were formed afterwards. I don't know whether you have anyone here who could do that. In fact, I don't know whether there is anyone in India who could do it. Sri Aurobindo knew. But someone who knows Sanskrit can… I don't know…
August 1965 Q. The language problem harasses India a good deal. What would be our correct attitude in this matter ? A.
Unity must be a living fact and not the imposition of an arbitrary
rule. When India will be one, she will have spontaneously a language
understood by all.
Vol. 12, p.253 -
The Mother 8 March 1968 A
disciple of our Ashram asked the Mother :
Mother,
A
common friend writes that Vinoba Bhave would like to know what exactly
Mother says about Sanskrit being the common national language of
India.
I
may add, do you expect the difficult grammar of Sanskrit to be learnt
by all ? Will it be for common use or only for ceremonial purposes,
like Latin in England ? The
Mother replied : For common use I was thinking of a simplified Sanskrit from the grammatical point of view. But of course, I do not know if it is possible. 16 August 1969 Sweet Mother, We would like to have -- as the expression of what You want -- a message from You about the new life for Sanskrit, of which You gave us a glimpse in Your talk of 11 November 1967. We would like to translate this message and publish it in the Ashram journals, for some disciples would like to know what You have said about this matter.
I see no need for any message. Messages only convince those who are already convinced. It would be better to learn Sanskrit and try to make it a truly living language. Blessings. - The Mother
4
October 1971 On
certain issues where You and Sri Aurobindo have given
direct answers, we (Sri Aurobindo's action) are also
specific, as for instance... on the language issue where You have said
for the country that (1) the regional language should be the medium of
instruction, (2) Sanskrit should be the national language, and (3)
English should be the international language.
Are
we correct in giving these replies to such questions ? Yes Blessings.
Hindi is good only for those who belong to a Hindi-speaking province. Sanskrit is good for all Indians.
Simplified
Sanskrit to replace Hindi as the language of India.
-
The Mother
A disciple of our Ashram was wrongly informed that Sri Aurobindo favoured Hindi as the national language of India; therefore he asked the Mother on what basis She had written : "The Sanskrit ought to be the national language of India." The Mother answered :
I said Sanskrit because Sri Aurobindo had told me so.
|